Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 138
Filtrar
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 30(11): 1541-1550, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34169607

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To estimate prevalence of prescription opioid use during pregnancy in eight US health plans during 2001-2014. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of singleton live birth deliveries. Maternal characteristics were ascertained from health plan and/or birth certificate data and opioids dispensed during pregnancy from health plan pharmacy records. Prevalence of prescription opioid use during pregnancy was calculated for any use, cumulative days of use, and number of dispensings. RESULTS: We examined prevalence of prescription opioid use during pregnancy in each health plan. Tennessee Medicaid had appreciably greater prevalence of use compared to the seven other health plans. Thus, results for the two groups were reported separately. In the seven health plans (n = 587 093 deliveries), prevalence of use during pregnancy was relatively stable at 9%-11% throughout 2001-2014. In Tennessee Medicaid (n = 256 724 deliveries), prevalence increased from 29% in 2001 to a peak of 36%-37% in 2004-2010, and then declined to 28% in 2014. Use for ≥30 days during pregnancy was stable at 1% in the seven health plans and increased from 2% to 7% in Tennessee Medicaid during 2001-2014. Receipt of ≥5 opioid dispensings during pregnancy increased in the seven health plans (0.3%-0.6%) and Tennessee Medicaid (3%-5%) during 2001-2014. CONCLUSION: During 2001-2014, prescription opioid use during pregnancy was more common in Tennessee Medicaid (peak prevalence in late 2000s) compared to the seven health plans (relatively stable prevalence). Although a small percentage of women had opioid use during pregnancy for ≥30 days or ≥ 5 dispensings, they represent thousands of women during 2001-2014.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Medicaid , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Embarazo , Prescripciones , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Transl Behav Med ; 11(3): 863-869, 2021 04 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33449120

RESUMEN

Use of digital communication technologies (DCT) shows promise for enhancing outcomes and efficiencies in asthma care management. However, little is known about the impact of DCT interventions on healthcare personnel requirements and costs, thus making it difficult for providers and health systems to understand the value of these interventions. This study evaluated the differences in healthcare personnel requirements and costs between usual asthma care (UC) and a DCT intervention (Breathewell) aimed at maintaining guidelines-based asthma care while reducing health care staffing requirements. We used data from a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial conducted in a large integrated health system involving 14,978 patients diagnosed with asthma. To evaluate differences in staffing requirements and cost between Breathewell and UC needed to deliver guideline-based care we used electronic health record (EHR) events, provider time tracking surveys, and invoicing. Differences in cost were reported at the patient and health system level. The Breathewell intervention significantly reduced personnel requirements with a larger percentage of participants requiring no personnel time (45% vs. 5%, p < .001) and smaller percentage of participants requiring follow-up outreach (44% vs. 68%, p < .001). Extrapolated to the total health system, cost for the Breathewell intervention was $16,278 less than usual care. The intervention became cost savings at a sample size of at least 957 patients diagnosed with asthma. At the population level, using DCT to compliment current asthma care practice presents an opportunity to reduce healthcare personnel requirements while maintaining population-based asthma control measures.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Teléfono Celular , Comunicación , Correo Electrónico , Personal de Salud/economía , Administración de Personal/economía , Administración de Personal/métodos , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 29(11): 1489-1493, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32929845

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The use of validated criteria to identify birth defects in electronic healthcare databases can avoid the cost and time-intensive efforts required to conduct chart reviews to confirm outcomes. This study evaluated the validity of various case-finding methodologies to identify neural tube defects (NTDs) in infants using an electronic healthcare database. METHODS: This analysis used data generated from a study whose primary aim was to evaluate the association between first-trimester maternal prescription opioid use and NTDs. The study was conducted within the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program. A broad approach was used to identify potential NTDs including diagnosis and procedure codes from inpatient and outpatient settings, death certificates and birth defect flags in birth certificates. Potential NTD cases were chart abstracted and confirmed by clinical experts. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are reported. RESULTS: The cohort included 113 168 singleton live-born infants: 55 960 infants with opioid exposure in pregnancy and 57 208 infants unexposed in pregnancy. Seventy-three potential NTD cases were available for the validation analysis. The overall PPV was 41% using all diagnosis and procedure codes plus birth certificates. Restricting approaches to codes recorded in the infants' medical record or to birth certificate flags increased the PPVs (72% and 80%, respectively) but missed a substantial proportion of confirmed NTDs. CONCLUSIONS: Codes in electronic healthcare data did not accurately identify confirmed NTDs. These results indicate that chart review with adjudication of outcomes is important when conducting observational studies of NTDs using electronic healthcare data.


Asunto(s)
Defectos del Tubo Neural , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Registros Médicos , Defectos del Tubo Neural/diagnóstico , Defectos del Tubo Neural/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo
4.
Front Public Health ; 8: 59, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195217

RESUMEN

Background: RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) dissemination and implementation frameworks define theory-based domains associated with the adoption, implementation and maintenance of evidence-based interventions. Used together, the two frameworks identify metrics for evaluating implementation success, i.e., high reach and effectiveness resulting in sustained practice change (RE-AIM), and modifiable factors that explain and enhance implementation outcomes (CFIR). We applied both frameworks to study the implementation planning process for a technology-delivered asthma care intervention called Breathewell within an integrated care organization. The goal of the Breathewell intervention is to increase the efficiency of delivering resource-intensive asthma care services. Methods: We reviewed historical documents (i.e., meeting agendas; minutes) from 14 months of planning to evaluate alignment of implementation team priorities with RE-AIM domains. Key content was extracted and analyzed on topics, frequency and amount of discussion within each RE-AIM domain. Implementation team members were interviewed using questions adapted from the CFIR Interview Guide Tool to focus their reflection on the process and contextual factors considered during pre-implementation planning. Documents and transcripts were initially coded using RE-AIM domain definitions, and recoded using CFIR constructs, with intent to help explain how team decisions and actions can contribute to adoption, implementation and maintenance outcomes. Results: Qualitative analysis of team documents and interviews demonstrated strong alignment with the RE-AIM domains: Reach, Effectiveness, and Implementation; and with the CFIR constructs: formal inclusion of provider and staff stakeholders in implementation planning, compatibility of the intervention with workflows and systems, and alignment of the intervention with organizational culture. Focus on these factors likely contributed to RE-AIM outcomes of high implementation fidelity. However, team members expressed low confidence that Breathewell would be adopted and maintained post-trial. A potential explanation was weak alignment with several CFIR constructs, including tension for change, relative priority, and leadership engagement that contribute to organizational receptivity and motivation to sustain change. Conclusions: While RE-AIM provides a practical framework for planning and evaluating practice change interventions to assure their external validity, CFIR explains why implementation succeeded or failed, and when used proactively, identifies relevant modifiable factors that can promote or undermine adoption, implementation, and maintenance.


Asunto(s)
Motivación , Cultura Organizacional , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa
5.
Med Care ; 58(4): 352-359, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32197029

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Challenges to health care efficiency are increasingly addressed with the help of digital communication technology tools (DCTs). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test whether DCT, compared with Usual Care, can reduce health care clinician burden without increasing asthma-related exacerbations among patients with asthma in a large integrated health care system. RESEARCH DESIGN: The (Breathewell) program was a pragmatic, randomized trial at (Kaiser Permanente Colorado), where asthma nurses screen patients for poor symptom control when beta2-agonist refill requests came within 60 days of previous fill or in the absence of a controller medication fill within 4 months (beta2-agonist overfill). A total of 14,978 adults with asthma were randomized to Usual Care or 1 of 2 DCT intervention groups (Text/Phone call or Email). SUBJECTS: Participants included adults 18 and older with an asthma diagnosis at the time of randomization and no history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. MEASURES: Primary outcome measures included asthma-related health care resource utilization (eg, asthma nurse contacts), medication use, and exacerbations. RESULTS: A total of 1933 patients had 4337 events which met beta2-agonist overfill criteria. Of the 2874 events in the intervention arm, 1188 (41%) were resolved by DCT contact and did not require additional clinician contact. Asthma medication use and exacerbations over 12 months did not differ among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: DCT tools can successfully contact adult asthma patients to screen for symptoms and facilitate intervention. The absence of differences in medication fills and health care utilization indicates that the strategic replacement of nursing interventions by digital outreach did not reduce treatment adherence or compromise health care outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Correo Electrónico , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Carga de Trabajo , Colorado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
6.
Perm J ; 24: 1-8, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33482949

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Refill reminders can help patients improve adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy. However, little is known about patient preferences for reminder type or whether patients who express a preference differ from patients who do not. OBJECTIVES: To describe patient preferences for ICS prescription refill reminder type and to compare baseline ICS therapy adherence, measured as proportion of days covered (PDC) 1 year before initiating preference-based reminders, between patients who did and did not express a preference. DESIGN: This substudy within a randomized multi-intervention study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Colorado. Adults with asthma randomized to intervention were offered the opportunity to choose text, telephone, or email reminders. Patients who did and did not provide a preference were compared by baseline characteristics using log-binomial models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes were reminder preference and type. RESULTS: A total of 1497 of 4545 patients (32.9%) expressed a preference; 789 (52.7%) chose text. The adjusted relative risk (aRR) of not providing a preference increased with decreasing PDC (PDC of 0.50 to < 0.80: aRR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.25; PDC < 0.5: aRR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.59-1.95) compared with patients with a PDC of 0.80 or greater. CONCLUSION: Among patients who expressed a preference, text reminders were preferred. Patients who expressed a preference had higher baseline adherence. Further research is needed to determine whether expressing a preference for a refill reminder type is itself associated with adherence. Given that offering the opportunity to choose a reminder type only engaged a subset of patients, further work is needed to understand how best to leverage technology-enabled communication outreach to help patients optimize adherence.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Teléfono
7.
Popul Health Manag ; 23(1): 3-11, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31107176

RESUMEN

Clinical laboratory quality improvement (QI) efforts can include population test utilization. The authors used a health care organization's Medical Data Warehouse (MDW) to characterize a gap in guideline-concordant laboratory testing recommended for safe use of antirheumatic agents, then tested the effectiveness of laboratory-led, technology-enabled outreach to patients at reducing this gap. Data linkages available through the Kaiser Permanente Colorado MDW and electronic health record were used to identify ambulatory adults taking antirheumatic agents who were due/overdue for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), complete blood count (CBC), or serum creatinine (SCr) testing. Outreach was implemented using an interactive voice response system to send patients text or phone call reminders. Interrupted time series analysis was used to estimate reminder effectiveness. Rates of guideline-concordant testing and testing timeliness in baseline vs. intervention periods were determined using generalized linear models for repeated measures. Results revealed a decrease in percentage of 3763 patients taking antirheumatic agents due/overdue for testing at any given time: baseline 24.3% vs. intervention 17.5% (P < 0.001). Among 3205 patients taking conventional antirheumatic agents, concordance for all ALT testing was baseline 52.8% vs. intervention 65.4% (P < 0.001) among patients chronically using these agents and baseline 20.6% vs. intervention 26.1% (P < 0.001) among patients newly starting these agents. The 95th percentiles for days to ALT testing were baseline 149 vs. intervention 117 among chronic users and baseline 134 vs. intervention 92 among new starts. AST, CBC, and SCr findings were similar. Technology-enabled outreach reminding patients to obtain laboratory testing improves health care system outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Monitoreo de Drogas , Comunicación en Salud/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sistemas Recordatorios , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Envío de Mensajes de Texto
8.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 143(4): 518-524, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30525932

RESUMEN

CONTEXT.­: The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include clinical, utilization, and administrative data, can improve patient care by ensuring appropriate test utilization. Cross-department, multidisciplinary collaboration to address gaps and improve patient and system outcomes is beneficial. OBJECTIVE.­: To demonstrate medical data warehouse utility for characterizing laboratory-associated quality gaps amenable to preanalytic or postanalytic interventions. DESIGN.­: A multidisciplinary team identified quality gaps. Medical data warehouse data were queried to characterize gaps. Organizational leaders were interviewed about quality improvement priorities. A decision aid with elements including national guidelines, local and national importance, and measurable outcomes was completed for each gap. RESULTS.­: Gaps identified included (1) test ordering; (2) diagnosis, detection, and documentation, and (3) high-risk medication monitoring. After examination of medical data warehouse data including enrollment, diagnoses, laboratory, pharmacy, and procedures for baseline performance, high-risk medication monitoring was selected, specifically alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, complete blood count, and creatinine testing among patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The test utilization gap was in monitoring timeliness (eg, >60% of patients had a monitoring gap exceeding the guideline recommended frequency). Other contributors to selecting this gap were organizational enthusiasm, regulatory labeling, and feasibility of a significant laboratory role in addressing the gap. CONCLUSIONS.­: A multidisciplinary process facilitated identification and selection of a laboratory medicine quality gap. Medical data warehouse data were instrumental in characterizing gaps.


Asunto(s)
Data Warehousing/métodos , Laboratorios/normas , Ensayos de Aptitud de Laboratorios/métodos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Humanos
9.
Am J Epidemiol ; 188(4): 709-723, 2019 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30535131

RESUMEN

Distributed data networks enable large-scale epidemiologic studies, but protecting privacy while adequately adjusting for a large number of covariates continues to pose methodological challenges. Using 2 empirical examples within a 3-site distributed data network, we tested combinations of 3 aggregate-level data-sharing approaches (risk-set, summary-table, and effect-estimate), 4 confounding adjustment methods (matching, stratification, inverse probability weighting, and matching weighting), and 2 summary scores (propensity score and disease risk score) for binary and time-to-event outcomes. We assessed the performance of combinations of these data-sharing and adjustment methods by comparing their results with results from the corresponding pooled individual-level data analysis (reference analysis). For both types of outcomes, the method combinations examined yielded results identical or comparable to the reference results in most scenarios. Within each data-sharing approach, comparability between aggregate- and individual-level data analysis depended on adjustment method; for example, risk-set data-sharing with matched or stratified analysis of summary scores produced identical results, while weighted analysis showed some discrepancies. Across the adjustment methods examined, risk-set data-sharing generally performed better, while summary-table and effect-estimate data-sharing more often produced discrepancies in settings with rare outcomes and small sample sizes. Valid multivariable-adjusted analysis can be performed in distributed data networks without sharing of individual-level data.


Asunto(s)
Confidencialidad/normas , Agregación de Datos , Diseño de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas , Difusión de la Información/métodos , Servicios de Información , Humanos , Análisis Multivariante , Privacidad , Puntaje de Propensión
10.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 28(2): 250-257, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30307780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC) is expected to increase as more women delay childbearing until later ages. However, information on frequency and incidence of PAC is scarce in the United States. METHODS: We identified pregnancies among women aged 10-54 years during 2001-2013 from five U.S. health plans participating in the Cancer Research Network (CRN) and the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program (MEPREP). We extracted information from the health plans' administrative claims and electronic health record databases, tumor registries, and infants' birth certificate files to estimate the frequency and incidence of PAC, defined as cancer diagnosed during pregnancy and up to 1 year postpartum. RESULTS: We identified 846 PAC events among 775,709 pregnancies from 2001 to 2013. The overall incidence estimate was 109.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 101.8-116.7) per 100,000 pregnancies. There was an increase in the incidence between 2002 and 2012 (the period during which complete data were available), from 75.0 (95% CI = 54.9-100.0) per 100,000 pregnancies in 2002 to 138.5 (95% CI = 109.1-173.3) per 100,000 pregnancies in 2012. The most common invasive cancers diagnosed were breast (n = 208, 24.6%), thyroid (n = 168, 19.9%), melanoma (n = 93, 11.0%), hematologic (n = 87, 10.3%), and cervix/uterus (n = 74, 8.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides contemporary incidence estimates of PAC from a population-based cohort of U.S. women. These estimates provide the data needed to help develop clinical and public health policies aimed at diagnosing PAC at an early stage and initiating appropriate therapeutic interventions in a timely manner.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Melanoma/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
11.
Pediatrics ; 143(1)2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30559122

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Previous analyses of data from 3 large health plans suggested that the substantial downward trend in antibiotic use among children appeared to have attenuated by 2010. Now, data through 2014 from these same plans allow us to assess whether antibiotic use has declined further or remained stable. METHODS: Population-based antibiotic-dispensing rates were calculated from the same health plans for each study year between 2000 and 2014. For each health plan and age group, we fit Poisson regression models allowing 2 inflection points. We calculated the change in dispensing rates (and 95% confidence intervals) in the periods before the first inflection point, between the first and second inflection points, and after the second inflection point. We also examined whether the relative contribution to overall dispensing rates of common diagnoses for which antibiotics were prescribed changed over the study period. RESULTS: We observed dramatic decreases in antibiotic dispensing over the 14 study years. Despite previous evidence of a plateau in rates, there were substantial additional decreases between 2010 and 2014. Whereas antibiotic use rates decreased overall, the fraction of prescribing associated with individual diagnoses was relatively stable. Prescribing for diagnoses for which antibiotics are clearly not indicated appears to have decreased. CONCLUSIONS: These data revealed another period of marked decline from 2010 to 2014 after a relative plateau for several years for most age groups. Efforts to decrease unnecessary prescribing continue to have an impact on antibiotic use in ambulatory practice.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Planes de Sistemas de Salud/tendencias , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Adolescente , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Afiliación Organizacional/tendencias
12.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 24(9): 856-861, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30156449

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Medicare STAR program for Medicare Advantage Plans that include drug benefits provides monetary incentives for health plans to achieve good adherence to oral antihyperglycemic (OAH) agents but does not account for differential case mix that could affect the ability of health plans to achieve the required quality metrics. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether OAH adherence varies by age and comorbidities among patients aged 65 years or older and the extent to which adherence affects glycemic control across age and comorbidity strata. METHODS: We studied 54,480 patients with diabetes aged > 65 years from the Colorado, Northwest, and Northern California regions of Kaiser Permanente who received OAH agents but not insulin in 2010. We calculated adherence using the proportion of days covered (PDC) method. Per the STAR program, hemoglobin A1c < 8% defined good glycemic control. We also defined poor control as A1c > 9%. We used modified Poisson regression to identify predictors of adherence and to determine its effects on A1c across age and comorbidity strata, adjusting for sociodemographics and medication-related variables. RESULTS: The risk of being adherent to OAH declined moderately with an increasing number of comorbidities (risk ratio [RR] = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-1.00 for 1 comorbidity and RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.88-0.91 for 4 or more comorbidities). Adherence to OAH agents was associated with a 0%-3% increased risk of A1c < 8% across age and comorbidity categories, as well as a large decreased risk (RR = 0.55-0.73) of A1c > 9% for patients aged < 80 years or with < 3 comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with diabetes aged > 65 years, having multiple comorbidities affects adherence. Adherence reduces the risk of poor A1c control among patients aged 65-79 years or with 2 or fewer comorbidities. Our results suggest that health plan case mix minimally influenced the Medicare STAR OAH adherence metric, but it may affect glycemic control quality measures, especially if a HEDIS-like measure of poor control were adopted. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by grant number 1R21DK103146-01A1 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disorders. Nichols currently receives grant funding from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sanofi, Amarin Pharma, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals for other unrelated research projects. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. This study was presented at the American Diabetes Association's 77th Scientific Sessions; June 9-13, 2017; San Diego, CA.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice Glucémico/efectos de los fármacos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Medicare Part C/tendencias , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Administración Oral , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Glucemia/metabolismo , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/tendencias , Femenino , Índice Glucémico/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 27(8): 872-877, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29932281

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In this report, we use data from FDA's Sentinel System to focus on how augmenting a diagnosis-based chronic kidney disease cohort with patients identified through laboratory results impacts cohort characteristics and outcomes. METHODS: We used data from 2 Data Partners. Patients were eligible if they were health plan members on January 1, 2012. We classified chronic kidney disease patients into mutually exclusive categories according to the hierarchy of (1) ICD-9-CM diagnosis (DXGroup), or (2) two estimated glomerular filtration rates <60 mL/min/1.73m2 , separated by at least 90 days (2-LabGroup), or (3) a single estimated glomerular filtration rates <60 mL/min/1.73m2 (1-LabGroup). We compared the groups on demographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics using pairwise standardized differences. We used Cox regression to compare the groups on mortality, adjusting for baseline covariates. RESULTS: We identified 209 864 patients: 107 607 in DxGroup (51%) and 102 257 (49%) from laboratory data alone. For every characteristic, the DxGroup was the sickest, followed by the 2-LabGroup and then the 1-LabGroup. The DxGroup was more likely to die than 2-LabGroup (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.22-1.77) at Site 1; that effect was observed, but attenuated, at Site 2 (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.25). The DxGroup was more likely to die than the 1-LabGroup at Site 1 (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.20-1.55), but not at Site 2 (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that drug safety researchers consider whether the method of cohort identification contributes to generalizability of safety findings.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacoepidemiología/métodos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico
14.
Med Care ; 56(5): 365-372, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29634627

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: New health policies may have intended and unintended consequences. Active surveillance of population-level data may provide initial signals of policy effects for further rigorous evaluation soon after policy implementation. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the utility of sequential analysis for prospectively assessing signals of health policy impacts. As a policy example, we studied the consequences of the widely publicized Food and Drug Administration's warnings cautioning that antidepressant use could increase suicidal risk in youth. METHOD: This was a retrospective, longitudinal study, modeling prospective surveillance, using the maximized sequential probability ratio test. We used historical data (2000-2010) from 11 health systems in the US Mental Health Research Network. The study cohort included adolescents (ages 10-17 y) and young adults (ages 18-29 y), who were targeted by the warnings, and adults (ages 30-64 y) as a comparison group. Outcome measures were observed and expected events of 2 possible unintended policy outcomes: psychotropic drug poisonings (as a proxy for suicide attempts) and completed suicides. RESULTS: We detected statistically significant (P<0.05) signals of excess risk for suicidal behavior in adolescents and young adults within 5-7 quarters of the warnings. The excess risk in psychotropic drug poisonings was consistent with results from a previous, more rigorous interrupted time series analysis but use of the maximized sequential probability ratio test method allows timely detection. While we also detected signals of increased risk of completed suicide in these younger age groups, on its own it should not be taken as conclusive evidence that the policy caused the signal. A statistical signal indicates the need for further scrutiny using rigorous quasi-experimental studies to investigate the possibility of a cause-and-effect relationship. CONCLUSIONS: This was a proof-of-concept study. Prospective, periodic evaluation of administrative health care data using sequential analysis can provide timely population-based signals of effects of health policies. This method may be useful to use as new policies are introduced.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Vigilancia de la Población , Intento de Suicidio/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Asunción de Riesgos , Ideación Suicida , Adulto Joven
15.
J Bone Miner Res ; 33(7): 1252-1259, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29529334

RESUMEN

Holidays from bisphosphonates (BPs) may help to prevent rare adverse events such as atypical femoral fractures, but may be appropriate only if risk of osteoporosis-related fractures does not increase. Our objective was to compare the incidence of osteoporosis-related fractures among women who had a BP holiday to those who continued to use BPs. This retrospective cohort study, conducted within four Kaiser Permanente integrated health system regions, included 39,502 women aged ≥45 years with ≥3 years exposure to BP. Participants with a BP holiday (≥12 months with no use) were compared to persistent (use with ≥50% adherence) and nonpersistent (use with <50% adherence) users for incident osteoporosis-related fractures. The BP holiday (n = 11,497), nonpersistent user (n = 10,882), and persistent user groups (n = 17,123) were observed for 156,657 person-years. A total of 5199 osteoporosis-related fractures (including 1515 hip fractures and 2147 vertebral fractures) were observed. Compared to the persistent use group, there was a slight difference in overall osteoporosis-related fracture risk (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.99)and no difference in hip fracture risk (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.10) for the BP holiday group. A slight reduction in risk of vertebral fracture was observed (HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95). Compared to the nonpersistent user group, the BP holiday group was at decreased risk for osteoporosis-related fractures (HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.79), vertebral fractures (HR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.78), and hip fractures (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.70). Women who undertake a BP holiday from BP of ≥12 months duration for any reason after ≥3 years of BP use do not appear to be at greater risk of osteoporosis-related fragility fracture, hip, or vertebral fractures compared to ongoing BP users. In our cohort, BP holiday remains a viable strategy for balancing the benefits and potential harms associated with long-term BP use. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.


Asunto(s)
Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Fracturas Óseas/inducido químicamente , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/inducido químicamente , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 27(10): 1053-1059, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29292555

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Algorithms using information from electronic health records to identify adults with type 1 diabetes have not been well studied. Such algorithms would have applications in pharmacoepidemiology, drug safety research, clinical trials, surveillance, and quality improvement. Our main objectives were to determine the positive predictive value for identifying type 1 diabetes in adults using a published algorithm (developed by Klompas et al) and to compare it to a simple requirement that the majority of diabetes diagnosis codes be type 1. METHODS: We applied the Klompas algorithm and the diagnosis code criterion to a cohort of 66 690 adult Kaiser Permanente Colorado members with diabetes. We reviewed 220 charts of those identified as having type 1 diabetes and calculated positive predictive values. RESULTS: The Klompas algorithm identified 3286 (4.9% of 66 690) adults with diabetes as having type 1 diabetes. Based on chart reviews, the overall positive predictive value was 94.5%. The requirement that the majority of diabetes diagnosis codes be type 1 identified 3000 (4.5%) as having type 1 diabetes and had a positive predictive value of 96.4%. However, the algorithm criterion involving dispensing of urine acetone test strips performed poorly, with a positive predictive value of 20.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Data from electronic health records can be used to accurately identify adults with type 1 diabetes. When identifying adults with type 1 diabetes, we recommend either a modified version of the Klompas algorithm without the urine acetone test strips criterion or the requirement that the majority of diabetes diagnosis codes be type 1 codes.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Análisis de Datos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
18.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 16(8): 1333-1341.e6, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29066370

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Reported prevalence of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) varies widely. Demographic features and treatment patterns are not well characterized in the United States (US). We analyzed data from the Fibrotic Liver Disease (FOLD) Consortium, drawn from 11 geographically diverse health systems, to investigate epidemiologic factors and treatment of PBC in the US. METHODS: We developed a validated electronic health record-based classification model to identify patients with PBC in the FOLD database from 2003 through 2014. We used multivariable modeling to assess the effects of factors associated with PBC prevalence and treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). RESULTS: We identified 4241 PBC cases among over 14.5 million patients in FOLD health systems; median follow-up was 5 years. Accuracy of the classification model was excellent, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 93%, 94% sensitivity, and 87% specificity. The average patient age at diagnosis was 60 years; 21% were Hispanic, 8% were African American, and 7% were Asian American/American Indian/Pacific Islander. Half of the cohort (49%) had elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase, and overall, 70% were treated with UDCA. The estimated 12-year prevalence of PBC was 29.3 per 100,000 persons. Adjusted prevalence values were highest among women (42.8 per 100,000), White patients (29.6 per 100,000), and patients 60-70 years old (44.7 per 100,000). Prevalence was significantly lower among men and African Americans (10.7 and 19.7 per 100,000, respectively) than women and whites; men and African Americans were also less likely to receive UDCA treatment (odds ratios, 0.6 and 0.5, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of a large cohort of patients with PBC receiving routine clinical care, we observed significant differences in PBC prevalence and treatment by gender, race, and age.


Asunto(s)
Colagogos y Coleréticos/uso terapéutico , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar/terapia , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores Raciales , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
19.
J Comp Eff Res ; 6(6): 537-547, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28805448

RESUMEN

AIM: To understand stakeholders' views on data sharing in multicenter comparative effectiveness research studies and the value of privacy-protecting methods. MATERIALS & METHODS: Semistructured interviews with five US stakeholder groups. RESULTS: We completed 11 interviews, involving patients (n = 15), researchers (n = 10), Institutional Review Board and regulatory staff (n = 3), multicenter research governance experts (n = 2) and healthcare system leaders (n = 4). Perceptions of the benefits and value of research were the strongest influences toward data sharing; cost and security risks were primary influences against sharing. Privacy-protecting methods that share summary-level data were acknowledged as being appealing, but there were concerns about increased cost and potential loss of research validity. CONCLUSION: Stakeholders were open to data sharing in multicenter studies that offer value and minimize security risks.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Difusión de la Información , Investigadores/psicología , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Confidencialidad , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Percepción , Medición de Riesgo
20.
Pharmacotherapy ; 37(10): 1204-1214, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28752555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Star program provides incentives to health plans when their patients with diabetes meet adherence targets to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) and statins. While a link between adherence and cardiovascular risk factor control is established, most studies included young patients with few comorbidities. Whether the Star adherence target is associated with reduced blood pressure or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in complex older patients is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: Determine correlates of adherence and examine the effect of meeting Star adherence targets on blood pressure and LDL-C in the Medicare-aged diabetes population. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Retrospective cohort study of 129,040 patients with diabetes aged 65 or older. MEASURES: Adherence estimated using proportion of days covered target ≥ 0.8; blood pressure < 140/90 mg Hg; LDL-C < 100 mg/dl. Modified Poisson regression used to assess relationships. RESULTS: Adherence differed little across elderly age groups. Compared to no comorbidity, high comorbidity (≥ 4) was associated with lower ACEI/ARB (risk ratio [RR] 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.89]) or statin (RR 0.91 [0.90-0.92]) adherence. ACEI/ARB adherence was not associated with blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg in patients ≥ 85 years (RR 1.01 [0.96-1.07]) or with multiple comorbidities (e.g., 3: RR 1.04 [0.99-1.08]). Statin adherence and LDL-C < 100 mg/dl were associated in all elderly age groups (e.g., ≥ 85: RR 1.13 [1.09-1.16]) and comorbidity levels (e.g., ≥ 4: RR 1.13 [1.12-1.15]). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to ACEI/ARB is not linked with reduced blood pressure in patients with diabetes who are at least 85 years or with multiple comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...